Category: Staff

Understanding Cultural Change

Dr Gareth Stanton was in Bangladesh in early April for a conference that marked the conclusion of a three-year collaboration between our Department and the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism at the University of Dhaka (currently having its 50th anniversary!). The conference was held on the 12th and 13th April at that university’s Centre for Advanced Research (CARS).

The focus for the conference was ‘Communication, Environment and Cultural Change’. Over the two days, participants heard papers addressing a wide variety of themes from reactions to cyclone events in Bangladesh to coverage of environmental issues in the local press in the Sundarbans, home of the Royal Bengal Tiger and a unique mangrove-based eco-system. Various environmental pressures on the region mean that important tree species are dying and salinity levels are changing. The historical role of protecting the region’s population from the effects of cyclonic activity has been steadily eroded in a part of the world that is already living on an environmental knife-edge. The Chair of  the Forum of Environmental Journalists of Bangladesh (FEJB), Quamrul Islam Chowdhury, spoke at the conference about the way in which environmental reporting in the Bangladeshi press has become increasingly displaced by political journalism and opinion. This is especially clear in the current political climate where a political stand-off between the two leading political parties, the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP,) has led to a series of national strikes (hartals) and the months of February and March witnessed what some have seen as the equivalent of the ‘Arab Spring’ in central Dhaka’s Shahbag district.

In the wake of the on-going war crimes trials in Bangladesh, thousands of demonstrators have been on the streets calling for the death penalty for ‘razakars’, an Urdhu word for volunteers, but here in Bangladesh the term for those who collaborated with the military forces of East Pakistan during the 1971 War of Liberation.  The Shahbag protestors have often been youthful and techno-savvy using social media and blogging to share their views and messages. After what was seen by some as initial government support, there has been an Islamacist backlash with demands being made for the reintroduction of segregated education at all levels and the death penalty for blaspheming bloggers. The day after the conference was over it was the Bangla New Year, Pahela Baishakh. Amid the joyful crowds and general celebration there was an apparent tension and the theme of the annual parade put on by students of the University’s Arts Faculty was a ‘razakar’-free Bangladesh. Some of this year’s wonderful floats made by the students themselves presented this theme. Behind all the politics, however, the environmental threats remain very real. One paper at the conference presented the results of earthquake modelling for Dhaka based on knowledge of building resilience across sections of both the old and new city. Tremors in excess of eight Richter’s would in all likelihood see many buildings collapse totally and cause casualties in the millions. The news of the terrible tragedy at Rana Plaza in Sava just outside Dhaka gives a terrible intimation of the havoc a large-scale earthquake would actually cause as well as shining a light on the conditions in Bangladesh’s massive garment industry.

 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Photomediations Machine

 

Professor Joanna Zylinska has just launched Photomediations Machine a curated online space where the dynamic relations of mediation as performed in photography and other media can be encountered, experienced and engaged.

Photomediations Machine adopts a process-based approach to image making by tracing the technological, biological, cultural, social and political flows of mediation that produce photographic objects. Showcasing theoretical and practical work at the intersections of art and mainstream practices, Photomediations Machine is both an archive of mediations past and a site of production of media as-we-do-not-know-them-yet. Photomediations Machine is non-commercial, non-profit and fully open access.

Curated by Professor Zylinska and the Taiwanese artist Ting Ting Cheng, Photomediations Machine has an International Advisory Board which includes Katherine Behar, Lisa Cartwright, Alberto López Cuenca, Asbjørn Grønstad, Richard Grusin, Sarah Kember, Max Liljefors, Melissa Miles, Nicholas Mirzoeff, W.J.T. Mitchell, Luiza Nader, Nina Sellars, Jonathan Shaw, Katrina Sluis, Marquard Smith, Hito Steyerl and Bernadette Wegenstein. It is a sister project to the online open access journal Culture Machine, established in 1999.

To find out more click here, or follow them on Twitter: @Photomediations. To find out more about Joanna Zylinska’s work click here.

 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

A Month of Contributions

April was a very busy month for Professor Aeron Davis, the Director of our MA in Political Communications. He was invited to give a series of lectures and make a substantial contribution to different debates, from the sociology of elites and power to the rationalisation of journalism.

Professor Davis’s research merges elements of politics, sociology and media and communication. His interests and expertise cover a range of different topics, including public relations, politics and political communication; promotional culture, media sociology and news production; markets and economic sociology; elites and power. He has investigated communication at Westminster, the London Stock Exchange, amongst the major political parties and across the trade union movement.

Professor Davis has published on each of these topics in journals and edited collections and is the author of Public Relations Democracy (MUP, 2002), The Mediation of Power (Routledge, 2007), Political Communication and Social Theory (Routledge, 2010) and Promotional Cultures (Polity, forthcoming 2013).

In April, Professor Davis was an invited guest at the EHESS (École des hautes études en sciences sociales) in Paris. He gave two public lectures on ‘The Sociology of Elites’, and ‘Forms of Media Capital and Mobility in Political Fields’. He was also an invited speaker at a Cambridge University workshop ‘Interogating Economics in the Public Sphere’. He shared a panel with Karel Williams, Maurice Glasman and Daniel Beunza. His paper was entitled ’Media as a Communicative Space for the Cooptation of Non-Financial Stakeholder Elites into Financialization’. He was also an invited speaker at a workshop organised by the Max Weber Study Group of the British Sociological Association. The workshop explored Weber’s thinking on the press and modern applications of this. Aeron’s paper was entitled ‘Hacking and Leveson as the Outcome of Modern Rationalised Journalism’.

To find out more about Aeron Davis research, click here.

 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

MEDIA REFORM MATTERS

Media Reform has become one of the key issues of our times, and in the last two years with the Media Reform Coalition, and our involvement with the Hacked Off Campaign our Department has made a fundamental contribution to national debates on media reform.

In April, 2013 at the National Conference for Media Reform in Denver, Des Freedman, Reader in our Department, discussed in an interview available online why putting media reform on top of the political agenda has become such an important priority not only in Britain but everywhere in the world.

On the 17th of June, 2013, our Department will be hosting the Strategies for Media Reform International Conference, which will provide a unique terrain for discussion on these pressing issues. The Conference is organised in anticipation to the International Communication Association Conference (ICA), and will be followed by a rally. To find out more or to register for the conference, click here.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Reforming the Press

Goldsmiths Professors James Curran and Natalie Fenton were identified as key people in the campaign to reform the press, and ‘write perhaps the most important constitutional change yet of the 21st century’.

In a two-page article in the Sunday Telegraph (March 31), Andrew Gilligan names James Curran as the ‘key intellectual inspiration’ for campaign group Hacked Off’. Hacked Off Director, Brian Cathcart, is also quoting as saying that Curran’s major book on the media is ‘the Bible’.

Professor Natalie Fenton is also identified as a central figure in the campaign to reform the press, as a co-director of Hacked Off, a member of the platform for most Hacked Off events, and co-founder of the Coordinating Committee for Media Reform. She is quoted as attacking increased market liberalisation of the media, and arguing that more media is not necessarily the same as greater media diversity.

Professor James Curran also debated the history and regulation of the press with Ian Hislop, Editor of Private Eye, on BBC Radio 3’s Nightwaves, on March 21. Ian Hislop emphasised the dangers of government censorship, while James Curran stressed the problem posed by market censorship.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

The Future of the British Press?

After the announcement on March the 18th that a new press regulatory body will be formed, Aljazeera Listening Post invited our Joint-Head of Department Professor Natalie Fenton to discuss the future of the British Press together with Stig Abell, the former director of the Press Complaints Commission; author Dan Hind; and Kirsty Hughes, the chief executive of Index on Censorship.

Last week, Professor Fenton, welcomed the press regulation deal, noting that: “It is a historic moment and good news that a decent cross party agreement on the future of an independent and effective self-regulatory system for the press has been found. Now is the moment for the press industry to come on board and enable good journalism to flourish.”

This week on AlJazeera, Professor Fenton, amongst other issues discussed the problem of media concentration in the UK and the need to tackle it.  To find out more, watch the AlJazeera Listening Post now.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

20 Years of New Media as Art

Next Wednesday the 27th of March, Professor Sean Cubitt will talk about how the interaction between electronic artists and their technologies creates a distinctive digital aesthetic at the Cybersalon.

Cybersalon is a monthly meeting of minds on how the Internet is shaping society for artists, entrepreneurs, techies, activists, academics and designers. This month Cybersalon is celebrating the past two decades of digital creativity in London and will look forward to the city’s next burst of artistic innovation.

New Media Art in the 1990s was not about a particular art form, but rather about exploring the emerging medium itself. Some have called it techno-deterministic, others saw it as a rise of new digital aesthetics. What is now clear is that the best artworks from this pioneering decade explored how the decentralised and open structure the Net encouraged the development of virtual and real-life communities. It was this artistic avant-garde that would find its home in the rave scene, cybercafes and autonomist collectives. In 2013, learning from this formative experience, both veterans and newcomers are producing many weird and wonderful media artworks for our own times.

Professor Sean Cubitt will be joined by other leading experts and practitioners in the field. Artist William Latham will show and speak about his early experimental work on digital sculptures, developing Mutator and its influence on the aesthetics of the Londonclub scene of the 1990s.

Ivan Pope, the founder of ArtNet BBS and co-director of Webmedia, will show the thinking, creation and impact of his first Web artwork – The Last Words of Dutch Schultz – and it’s implication for today’s Net innovators.

Ruth Catlow and Marc Garrett will discuss Furtherfield, its online community, and their physical gallery space, and showcase the latest trends and up-and-coming artists of London’s new media art scene.

The panel will be chaired by Ilze Black, Queen Mary, University of London; co-founder of network media group Take2030; and OPEN art bureau in1990s post-Soviet Latvia.

There will also be exhibits by David John Russell, ‘Puppets of my creations’; and other new media artworks from London 1994-2013. Tunes: Wildlife Display Team.

Come to Cybersalon to discuss the past, present and future of new media art in this vibrant city. London’s greatest contributions to digital aesthetics are yet to come. Entrance is free but please book here.

Venue:
The Arts Catalyst,
50-54 Clerkenwell Road,
London EC1M 5PS

6.30pm: doors open and drinks. Discussion: 7.00 – 9.00 pm. Followed by drinks in the pub: The Slaughtered Lamb.

This event is organised in partnership with the
School of Media & Performing Arts, Middlesex University and
Easynet.

We’re collecting work to create an archive of the past twenty years of digital culture in London. We want your old hardware and software!

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Response to Press Regulation Deal

A new system of press regulation established by royal charter and underpinned by statute has been agreed by political parties and sent to the palace for royal approval.

Academics from the Department of Media and Communications from Goldsmiths, University of London respond to the press regulation deal struck by the parties…

Angela Phillips, Senior Lecturer and Chair of the Ethics Committee, Media Reform Coalition:

“Today’s deal on the Leveson reforms should provide a regulator strong enough to protect the press from its own worst instincts. We look forward to the passing of the Defamation Bill, later this week, to provide much needed protection for journalists themselves. Together these two pieces of legislation will move our media laws forward, bringing them into line with a reality in which news organisations have vast powers in comparison to ordinary individuals and some powerful individuals and organisations have unreasonable powers in relation to journalists.

“At last the balance is shifting, giving journalists greater rights to snap at the heels of those in power, while protecting the innocent from having their lives raked over to increase tabloid profits.”

Natalie Fenton, Professor in Media & Communications and Director of the Hacked Off campaign for a free and accountable press:

“It is a historic moment and good news that a decent cross party agreement on the future of an independent and effective self-regulatory system for the press has been found. Now is the moment for the press industry to come on board and enable good journalism to flourish.”

Professor Tim Crook, Senior Lecturer in Communications and author of UK Media Law Pocketbook and Comparative Media Law & Ethics:

“It is not in the interests of democracy that the UK’s leading print media institutions are cowered, humiliated, fearful, disempowered and ‘controlled’ or ‘punished’ by the introduction of any form of general state supervision of the regulation of its published content over and above the laws applied to everyone in respect of libel, contempt, privacy and copyright.

“The solution to media harm in any context is low financial, non-custodial restorative justice remedies based on apology and forgiveness, not the retributive, vengeful and aggressive rhetoric and legalism that has characterised the current debate.”

Dr Des Freedman, Reader in Communications & Cultural Studies:

“Is the model of regulation contained in the Royal Charter strong enough to tackle the kind of press power that led to the setting up of the Leveson Inquiry?

“There are certainly elements of the deal that should help to iron out some of the worst examples of intrusion and inaccuracy and to provide the basis for a more ethical press. Ordinary journalists and members of the public will be part of the process of drawing up a new code while preventing editors from having a veto over membership of the new regulator is already a step forward from the utterly discredited, industry-dominated Press Complaints Commission. Allowing for third party complaints is another significant step forward so that, finally, there can be more challenges to those titles that take pleasure in scapegoating and stereotyping vulnerable groups like asylum seekers and refugees. Access for ordinary people to a free arbitration system as well as the regulator’s power to insist on prominent corrections and apologies should also help to stop of the worst excesses of sensationalist journalism.

“Of course, the effectiveness of the scheme depends on the ability of the regulator to stand up to press power and the willingness of the press to be subject to the new rules. Some titles may even choose to stand outside the system and use their wealth as a shield against what they see as an affront to their freedom to bully, distort and, as Lord Justice Leveson put it, to ‘wreak havoc on the lives of innocent people.

“More significantly, however, the Royal Charter does nothing to change the cause of the arrogance, complacency and neoliberal orthodoxy of titles like the Mail, Sun, Express and Telegraph: the fact that the British press is dominated by a handful of giant corporations whose responsibility is not to the public but to shareholders and proprietors hungry for profits and power. Changing the culture of the British press requires not just better codes and a more forceful means of persuading newspapers to play by the rules (though this would be very welcome both for ordinary journalists and the public) but will involve a challenge to an ownership structure that has placed the press in the hands of a tiny group of oligarchs and moguls. How can our media be said to be genuinely free when it is subject to the diktat of men like Rupert Murdoch, Paul Dacre, the Barclay Brothers and Richard Desmond?”

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Choose Your Charter!

Today a potentially historic vote on whether and how the UK press should be regulated will be voted on by the House of Commons. Professor Natalie Fenton, our Joint Head of Department, has set out the case for the opposition against the British government’s approach in an article on OpenDemocracy.

She argued that, on first glance the two Royal Charters look rather similar.  But the devil really is in the detail – and the Press lawyer’s know this. There are some crucial differences between the two proposals which make the cross-party charter a significantly better reflection of Leveson’s proposals than Cameron’s Charter.

Professor Natalie Fenton is Co-Director of the Goldsmiths Leverhulme Media Research Centre and the Centre for the Study of Global Media and Democracy. She has published widely on issues relating to news, journalism, radical politics and new media. Her latest books are ‘New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age‘ (Sage, 2010) and ‘Misunderstanding the Internet’ written with James Curran and Des Freedman (Routledge, 2012).

To find out the differences between the two charters, you can read the full article here.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Life after New Media, an Interview

On the 7th of March, Professor Sarah Kember and Professor Joanna Zylinska have been interviewed by Culture Machine Live an extension of the online, open access journal of culture, theory and technology, Culture Machine

Culture Machine Live, offers a series of podcasts, which explore a range of key issues in cultural studies and cultural theory. In the past, interviewees and speakers included key scholars such as Chantal Mouffe, Geert Lovink, Alan Liu, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.

Joanna and Sarah’s interview, by Janneke Adema and Ben Craggs, focused on their recently published co-authored monograph Life After New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process (MIT, 2012). The topics discussed included the vitality of mediation, human agency, the ‘Two Cultures’ divide, or the ethics of the cut.

You can listen to the full podcast on Culture Machine Live. Or you can visit Sarah Kember and Joanna Zylinska’s webpages.

Image courtesy of Disruptivemedia.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter